首页> 外文OA文献 >Transport and magnetic critical current in superconducting MgB2 wires
【2h】

Transport and magnetic critical current in superconducting MgB2 wires

机译:MgB2超导导线中的传输和磁性临界电流

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Direct comparison of the magnetic and transport critical current density (Jc) for the same pieces of copper-sheathed MgB2 wires shows a large discrepancy in magnitude and field dependence of the two. The value of magnetic Jc can differ from the value of transport Jc by a factor of 10 or more. This discrepancy does not occur merely because of the difference in the voltage at which the magnetic and transport Jc are measured, but mainly because of the specific microstructure of MgB2. Such microstructure results in superconducting screening on at least two different length-scales, despite the absence of weak links in MgB2, leading to erroneous magnetic Jc if a simple critical state model is applied to such a system. Consequently, the magnetic Jc cannot be used for analysis of physical processes where the accurate field dependence of Jc needs to be known, such as vortex pinning. The magnetic Jc can still be used for qualitative comparison of MgB2 samples if they are all of the same size and have the same microstructure, or if their size is large enough so that the magnetic Jc does not depend on the sample size.
机译:直接比较同一根带护套的MgB2导线的磁和运输临界电流密度(Jc),显示两者的大小和磁场依赖性存在很大差异。磁性Jc的值可能与传输Jc的值相差10倍或更多。这种差异不会仅仅因为测量磁性和传输Jc的电压差而发生,而是主要由于MgB2的特定微观结构。尽管在MgB2中不存在弱连接,但这种微结构仍会在至少两个不同的长度尺度上导致超导屏蔽,如果将简单的临界状态模型应用于此类系统,则会导致错误的Jc磁化。因此,磁性Jc无法用于分析需要知道Jc的精确场相关性的物理过程,例如涡旋钉扎。如果MgB2样品的大小相同且具有相同的微观结构,或者它们的大小足够大,以致于磁性Jc不受样品大小的影响,磁性Jc仍可用于定性比较MgB2样品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号